Facts & Myths
- Age Groups
- Average Speed
- Braking
- Cause of Death
- Cell Phones
- Hidden Camera Trial
- Independent Reviews
- Injury Trends
- Kinetic Energy
- Kloeden Critique
- Overtaking
- Overtaking Trucks
- Rigid Enforcement
- Sex Differences
- Silly Statistics
- Speed Limits
- Ticket Quotas
- Worldwide Trends

« Go back?
Independent Policy Reviews The mythical Independent Reviewer

Fact

LTSA & Police Myth
LTSA road safety policies have repeatedly been reviewed only by the original advocates for those policies - the State of Victoria  police and State of Victoria Monash University Accident Research Centre. LTSA Policy Decisions are Verified by Independent Academic Reviewers!

The original introduction of Speed Cameras to New Zealand in 1993 was advocated by the Australian Victoria State police and their brothers-in-arms at advocating the most rigid and severe speed limit enforcement - the Monash University Accident Research Centre.

The following request was made to the New Zealand Minister of Transport under the Official Information Act:

With regard to supposed benefits of LTSA's rigid enforcement policies, please supply ... a list of LTSA documentation and publications relevant to evaluating these policies as applied in NZ.

This table was supplied in response:

The following are evaluations, reviews or assessments of the programme, or its components, undertaken since 1994

1 March 1994 Report the Controller and Auditor-General Controller and Auditor-General
2 September 1995 Safety (Administration) Programme Outputs 1990-1996 Coopers & Lybrand
3 October 1995 Land Transport Safety Authority Performance Review Arthur Anderson, Research and Safety Services, Ministry of Transport and LTSA
4 December 1995 Review of the Safety Administration Programme LTSA Working Group for the National Road Safety Committee
5 March 1996 New Zealand Police Peer Group Review of Traffic Enforcement Chief Inspector Harry Hayes and Inspectors Michael Moloney and Terry Lester
6 August 1996 Review of road safety advertising in New Zealand Vulcan & Cameron
7 December 1996 Review of evaluation of the Supplementary Road Safety Package Vulcan & Cameron
8 December 1997 Report of the Controller and Auditor-General (Forth Report for 1997) Controller and Auditor-General
9 July 1998 Review of the Supplementary Road Safety Package and its outcomes during the first two years Vulcan & Cameron
10 October 1998 Performance review of the LTSA, Commissioned by the Ministry of Transport Pricewaterhousecoopers
11 February ???? Review of the Safety Administration Programme Baseline – Report to the Ministry of Transport Peter Vulcan, Chris Gould & Michael Hannigan
12 May 2001 Strategic Advertising and Enforcement Review – a report to the LTSA and NZ Police Superintendent Harry Hayes of the Victoria Police & Peter Vulcan
13 April 2002 Enhancing road safety through community development: “It starts with saying Gidday” – Review of the Community Road Safety Programme for the LTSA Alison McDonald, McDonald Management Contracting
14 April 2002 Bring Down the Road Toll: the Speed Camera Programme Controller and Auditor-General
15 August 2002 Peer Review of Risk Targeted Patrol Plans and Road Policing Intelligence Peter Vulcan, Michael Rusbatch, Paul Graham
16 November 2002 An evaluation of the Supplementary Road Safety Package July 1995 to June 2000 – for the LTSA Max Cameron, Jagadish Guria & Joanne Leung
17 August 2003 Assessment of Strategies, Policies and Programmes affecting Road Safety – report to the LTSA Peter Vulcan, Harry Hayes, Narelle Haworth & John McLean
18 September 2003 Annual New Zealand Road Safety Programme Survey of Key Client Groups BRC – Marketing & Social Research
19 December 2003 New Zealand Road Safety Programme: Review of Business Processes and Resource Levels for Selected Programme Outputs – report to the LTSA and the NZ Police Allan Kennaird

Authors marked in red in the above table are senior members of the Victorian police or the Monash Accident Research Centre.

Apart from local bureaucrats and marketing, accountancy and management consultancy firms the ONLY independent reviews of the LTSA speed policies have been their original advocates.

Astoundingly, the New Zealand taxpayer has funded a gravy train where the Victorian "Speed Kills" advocates have been allowed ten years of unchallenged and uncritical freedom to promote their policies.

This is how such catastrophic policy failures have been allowed to continue and develop.


      


Created in Zenago's Website Management System: In-Control. Want to manage your own website? Click here to find out how...